Session Descriptions

Session descriptions will be added as they are confirmed. Please check this page regularly for updated information.  

All sessions will be presented in English and simultaneous interpretation into Spanish will be provided for all plenary and selected concurrent sessions.

Click on the links below to be directed to specific days:

Sunday, April 17

 

Pre-Symposium Workshop

This session will be presented in Spanish with some English.
09:00-12:30

  • Mario Chiong Lay, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
  • Leonardo Arriagada Rivas, San Juan de Dios Hospital, Santiago, Chile
  • Betzabé Rubio Lara, Institute of Cancer Therapies Providencia, Santiago, Chile
  • Paul Sessink, Exposure Control Sweden AB, Bohus-Björkö, Sweden
  • Johan Vandenbroucke, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

The pre-symposium workshop aims to update the basic concepts in oncology pharmacy practice. The following topics will be covered: (1) pharmacogenomics and pharmacokinetics of anticancer therapies, (2) management of major adverse events associated with chemotherapy and (3) updates on safe handling of cytotoxics.

Learning objectives:

  1. To gain an understanding of the role of pharmacogenomics in cancer treatment;
  2. To discuss the management of anticancer-therapies induced adverse events; and
  3. To appreciate the latest advances on safe handling of cytotoxics.

 

Opening Plenary: Access to Cancer Medicines: Global Disparities Deserve Global Attention

Julie Torode, Union for International Cancer Control (UICC), Geneva, Switzerland
16:15-17:15

Cancer is composed of a complex set of heterogeneous diseases which require very different and multidisciplinary approaches to assure optimal outcomes for patients.  With our improving understanding of the molecular characteristics of cancer and an increasing array of tools to intervene, most patients today can expect to benefit from clinical intervention – whether achieving long-term remission, cure, or palliation. However, this progress is predicated on the assumption that cancer patients have routine and continuous access to quality affordable cancer medicines.

In recent years the global health community has begun to focus its attention on NCDs – including cancer - as evidence of the current global epidemic has grown. Following the UN High Level Meeting on NCDs in 2011, the World Health Organization (WHO) developed its Global Access Plan on the Prevention and Control of NCDs. Supported by a resolution on Access To Essential Medicines, adopted by WHO in 2014, this Plan calls for – among other targets – an 80% availability of affordable, basic technologies and essential medicines by 2025, including those for cancer.

In spite of commitments of all governments around the world to this global inspirational goal on access and emerging discussions on universal health coverage, many under-resourced countries lack the bandwidth to develop national cancer formularies and address the complex web of barriers and challenges to implement the necessary infrastructure and processes at a national level. Recognising more than 60% of the world’s total cases of cancers occur in Africa, Asia, and Central and South America, and these regions already account for approximately 70% of the world’s cancer deaths, UICC advocates for urgent attention to address the global disparity in availability and access to cancer treatment and care services as well as rational selection of cancer medicines aligned with national needs.

Learning Objectives:

  1. Give an overview of UN process that have put access on the global health agenda;
  2. Introduce UICCs work on essential cancer medicines which provided the basis of updates adopted in the new 2015 WHO Model List of Essential Medicines
  3. Consider the role of the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines as a first step in stimulating national action and access to life saving cancer treatment services; and
  4. Discuss additional barriers and challenges such as regulatory and distribution hurdles and opportunities for ISOPP to bring expertise and engagement to achieve the 80% by 2025 target. 

Monday, April 18

 

Plenary: Novel Immunotherapy for Melanoma: Mechanisms, Outcomes, and Future Strategies

R. Donald Harvey, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
9:00-9:45

Therapeutic antibodies that block the programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) immune checkpoint pathways prevent T-cell downregulation and promote immune responses against a number of cancer types, with melanoma being the prototype disease for initial investigation of single agent and combination strategies. The US FDA has approved  ipilimumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab for advanced melanoma, and additional investigations are ongoing. This session will review the pharmacology, clinical trial and adverse event data, and potential future of agents that block CTLA-4, PD-1 or its ligands, and novel pathways (e.g., CSF-1R, OX40) as melanoma and anticancer therapy.

Learning Objectives:

  1. Distinguish between the indicated uses, mechanisms of action, depth and duration of clinical responses, and safety of current and emerging immunotherapeutic targeted agents;
  2. Outline a treatment plan for newly diagnosed melanoma patients to achieve the deepest and most durable response while balancing the risk for adverse events; and
  3. Describe emerging pathways and potential targets for the next generation of immunotherapy.

 

Plenary: Clinical Impact and Recent Outcomes of Immunotherapy in Solid Tumours: Is it the Pathway for Cancer Cure?

Christian Caglevic, Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile
10:15-11:00

The lecture will talk about the principles of immunotherapy and cancer and the current treatment options for cancer patients.

Learning Objectives:

  1. Show the main mechanisms of immunotherapy in cancer pathogenia and treatment;
  2. Describe the principles of use and toxicities related with immunotherapy drugs; and
  3. Show the development of the main immunotherapy and their outcomes  in cancer treatment.

 

Concurrent Sessions 1
Clinical 1A: Solid Tumor Updates

11:00-12:00

Solid Tumor Update: Lung Cancer
Evelyn Handel, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), Ambler, PA, USA

The treatment options for patients with lung cancer have greatly expanded as a result of advances in immunotherapy and targeted therapy. This presentation will briefly review the molecular biology and subtypes of lung cancer and then describe how the new therapeutic approvals and indications for medications used to treat lung cancer fit in among previous therapies. The clinical data for new agents as well as updated guideline recommendations in the treatment of lung cancer will also be discussed. Lastly, emerging data on investigational agents and therapeutic approaches with potential importance in the treatment of patients with lung cancer will also be reviewed.

Learning Objectives:

  1. Briefly review the molecular biology and different subtypes of lung cancer;
  2. Describe the clinical data and rationale for new therapeutic approvals/indications and updated guideline recommendations in the treatment of lung cancer; and
  3. Discuss emerging data on investigational agents and therapeutic approaches with potential importance in the treatment of patients with lung cancer.

Solid Tumor Update: Breast Cancer
Kellie Jones Weddle, Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, USA

Breast cancer treatments are constantly evolving.  As clinicians understand the biology of the disease better, unique targeted therapies are created.  In this presentation, we will review the use of the HER-2 targeted therapies and how this landscape has changed.  We will also discuss the role of pertuzumab in both the neoadjuvant and metastatic settings.  Newer therapies have been approved for use in hormone positive patients.  We will review the data with palbociclib in the metastatic setting and discuss its role in therapy.  Lastly, we will review updated changes to the breast cancer screening guidelines.

Learning Objectives:

  1. Discuss the role of pertuzumab in the metastatic and neoadjuvant settings;
  2. Review the use of Her2 targeted therapies in early and late stage breast cancer;
  3. Evaluate the role of palbociclib in hormone receptor positive breast cancer; and
  4. Discuss the changes in the breast cancer screening guidelines in the United States.

Research 1B: Research with Complementary Alternative Medications in Oncology

11:00-12:00

Judith Smith, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Medical School, Houston, TX, USA

The session will discuss the use of complimentary alternative medications (CAM) including herbal, nutritional, vitamin and mineral supplement in the oncology arena. Briefly we will review the data demonstrating the benefits of CAM agents for both cancer prevention and treatment focusing potential to improve patient outcomes. Updates on how to evaluate the literature and identifying resources to assist in identifying and preventing potential supplement-chemotherapy interactions will be reviewed.

Learning Objectives:

  1. Identify herbal and nutritional supplements that have been associated with the prevention or treatment of various cancers;
  2. Evaluate the use of herbal and nutritional supplements in the treatment of treatment-related side effects based upon a review of the literature presented; and
  3. Critique the use of herbal and nutritional supplements as either a direct or indirect interaction with chemotherapy, radiation or surgical interventions for cancer.

 

Concurrent Sessions 2
Clinical 2A: Antiemetic Updates

12:00-13:00

Antiemetic Update: Olanzapine
Alexandre Chan, National University of Singapore, Singapore

Prevention and control of CINV are paramount in the management of patients with cancer. Olanzapine, which is an atypical antipsychotic, has gained a lot of attention within the area of cancer supportive care as it is able to blocks multiple receptors that are implicated in the pathogenesis of CINV. In this session, we will review the mechanism of action of olanzapine and discuss its implication for CINV management. We will also review the emerging data that suggest olanzapine’s role for preventing CINV and treatment of breakthrough and refractory CINV. Lastly, we will discuss the current guideline recommendations on olanzapine for CINV management.

    Learning Objectives:

    1. Understand the mechanism of action of olanzapine and its implication on CINV management;
    2. Review the evidence for treating refractory and breakthrough CINV with olanzapine;
    3. Review the evidence for preventing CINV with olanzapine; and
    4. Discuss the current guideline recommendations on olanzapine for CINV management.

    Antiemetic Update: New NK1 Antagonists
    Ivonne Flores, Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile

    Nausea and vomiting are the main and most common side effects of chemotherapy.

    Introduction of aprepitant, the first NK1 antagonist, to the combination of antagonists of the 5-HT3 and dexamethasone, has been for years the standard prophylaxis for highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Currently, new NK1 antagonist agents have been developed, which mechanisms of action and their relationship to the pathways involved in emesis, will be review in this session. In addition, the current recommendations of the clinical guidelines of antiemetic therapy in relation to the NK1 antagonists will be review.

    Learning Objectives:

    1. Learn the history of the development of NK1 antagonists;
    2. Review current NK1 antagonist agents;
    3. Understand the mechanism of action of NK1 antagonists and their relationship with other drugs involved in the management of nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy; and
    4. Review current recommendations of antiemetic treatment guidelines in relation to the NK1 antagonists.

     

    Fundamental 2B: Pharmacovigilance Plan for Biologics and Biosimilar Antibodies: Is It Really Useful? 

    12:00-13:00

    Alain Astier, Henri Mondor University Hospital Group, Créteil, France

    A major event, today and for the next years, is that many medications such as monoclonal antibodies (e.g. trastuzumab and rituximab) are no longer subject to patent restrictions. Considering the very high cost of these biologics, judicious use of biosimilars are of paramount importance to lower the expenses and to permit their wider access to patients, especially in developing countries. However, strong oppositions against biosimilars remain.

    It is important for phamacists to understand that biosimilars can be now fully described and characterized from a physico-chemical point of view. Particularly, the aggregation profile can be deeply analyzed.  Micron-size aggregates are also responsible for unwanted immunological side-effects. These aspects will be discussed in detail during the presentation.

    Thus, long-term pharmacovigilance plan are required to detect any differences in the tolerance profile of biosimilars.

    Learning Objectives:

    1. Describe major methods to characterize biosimilars;
    2. Understand the role of aggregation in the side-effects of biologics; and
    3. Discuss the interest of a post-market authorization pharmacovigilance plan.

    Research 2C: Epigenetic Bases of Gastric Cancer: From Pathogenesis to the Potential Identification of New Targets for Prevention and Treatment  

    12:00-13:00
    Alejandro Corvalan, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile

    Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related death. The low-abundance of mutations on comprehensive molecular evaluation of primary tumors suggests that other mechanisms contribute to this disease. For example, epigenetic alterations including DNA methylation of promoter sites, short and long noncoding RNAs and histone modifications ultimately control gene expression. This presentation aims to elaborate on the role of epigenetics in the pathogenesis of gastric cancer and the potential identification of new targets for prevention and treatment of disease based exclusively on epigenetic alterations. 

    Learning Objectives:

    1. Review Gastric Cancer;
    2. Understand Genetic and Epigenetic bases of gastric cancer; and
    3. Discuss Translational epigenetic research in diagnosis and treatment on gastric cancer.

     

    Concurrent Sessions 3
    Clinical 3A:
      Pediatrics/Adolescents/Young Adults Update

    14:30-16:00

    Description of Tools Pharmaceutical Care in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Pharmacogenomics) Hospital Pediatric Experience Chilean Program Associated with Antineoplastic Drugs (PINDA)
    Jorge Morales Vallespín, Luis Calvo Mackenna Hospital, Santiago, Chile

    Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common oncological disease in children, with the peak incidence occurring at 3 to 5 years of age. In Chile, diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of these patients is within the PINDA program, the Spanish “Programa Infantil de Drogas Antineoplásicas”, where these patients receive multidisciplinary care.

    Treatment of patients with ALL is generally classified into different phases: induction, early intensification, consolidation, re-induction and maintenance, showing remission rates close to 90%. In these phases of the protocol, patients receive different types of antineoplastic drugs, highlighting the 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) in oral therapy, being present in 3 of the 5 stages of treatment.

    Although 6-MP plays a pivotal role in treatment, it is not without side effects, and these effects are much increased in patients with single nucleotide polymorphism in genes coding for 6-MP metabolizing enzymes such as TPMT and ITPA. Therefore, it is important to detectaction and incorporate pharmacotherapeutic monitoring in this group of patients.

    Learning Objectives:

    1. Introduce the PINDA program for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in pediatrics in Chie;
    2. Evaluate the clinical monitoring tools for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Chile;
    3. Establish a connection between certain genotypes coding for the enzyme TPMT and adverse effects during therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (RAM reports and prevalence in patients at follow-up);
    4. Determine the most effective phamacotherapy based on genotype frequencie; and
    5. Evaluate and adhere to treatment guidelines: Mercaptopurine dose changes according to polymorphism results and according to pharmaceutical care.

    Update on Paediatric Bone Tumours
    John Wiernikowski, McMaster Children’s Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada

    Bone tumours in children are comprised primarily of Osteogenic Sarcoma and Ewings Sarcoma which is often subcategorized as Osseous, Extra-Osseous and Primitive neuroectodermal tumours. The annual incidence of these tumours are on the order of 4 and 3 cases per million respectively, but show considerable geographic variability.

    Despite aggressive management with chemotherapy, surgery and (for Ewings sarcomas) radiation; 5 yr EFS rates range from 60-70% for children and adolescents with localized disease, and only 20-25% for those with metastatic disease at diagnosis. 

    Recently, advances in molecular biology of these tumours has identified a host of new targets including Tyrosine Kinases, IGFR-1, m-TOR, EWS-FLI-1 and targetable pathways that offer the promise of better outcomes for this patient population. This talk will review and update the data on these new molecular targets and available clinical trial data.

    Learning Objectives:

    1. Be able to distinguish between Osteogenic and Ewing’s Sarcomas and appreciate the geographic variability in incidence of these entities;
    2. Appreciate the various treatment modalities utilized in the treatment of bone tumours;
    3. Understand newly identified molecular targets in these disease entities and drugs currently being evaluated in clinical trials; and
    4. Appreciate approaches to global co-operation in clinical trial execution that are accelerating accrual of patients to these trials.

     

    Fundamental 3B: USP 800 Implementation and Practical Considerations

    14:30-16:00

    USP 800 Implementation: Considerations Across Practice Settings
    Rowena Schwartz, McKesson Specialty Health, Magnolia, TX, USA

    The recent USP 800 guidelines have recently been published and are widely being evaluated around the world.  During this presentation we will discuss the guidelines, and the practicalities of implementing these recommendations in a variety of practice settings in the United States. 
     

    USP 800 Implementation: Consider a Case of the National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan
    Shinya Suzuki, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japanese Society of Pharmaceutical Oncology, Kashiwa, Japan

    Recently, the first guideline for handling hazardous cancer agents, “JSCN/JSMO/JASPO Joint Guidelines for Safe Handling of Cancer Chemotherapy Drugs 2015” has been established in Japan. (*JSCN: Japanese Society of Cancer Nursing, JSMO: Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, JASPO: Japanese Society of Pharmaceutical Oncology) The JASPO played an important role in making the guideline, and the National Cancer Center Hospital East (NCCHE) is one of the leading institution that will conduct projects to prevent exposure of the hazardous medicines. When we made the guideline, we realized many real world discrepancies between ideal management and daily practice management within a hospital. At NCCHE, we encountered some problems when implementing the international guidelines, such as the USP 800, which is one of the core ideas to perform safe handling of hazardous medicine. In the session, I will share ideas and tips on how to implement the USP 800 for the non-US countries through our experience at the NCCHE in Japan.

    Learning Objectives:

    1. Recognize and share the problems with implementing the USP 800 in other countries;
    2. Understand how to implement the USP 800 in other countries; and
    3. Share the experience and ideas learned when we implement the USP 800.

    Fundamental 3C: Fundamental: Education, Competency and Mentorship

    14:30-16:00

    Judith Smith, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
    Barry Goldspiel, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA

    This session will discuss how the three topics of education, competency and mentorship are related. The first part of the didactic lecture will provide key elements and tools to be used for chemotherapy education and tools for the “peripheral brain” reminders. Examples and electronic copies (bring your own jump drive) will be provided for audience to take home and implement. This will transition how and why oncology pharmacy can take the lead in establishing chemotherapy competency programs for the multidisciplinary team.  Finally, the session will discuss role of mentorship throughout professional development across lifespan. Real-life scenarios will be provided to help role model successful mentorship and how it is key ingredient in professional development. 

    Learning Objectives:

    1. Compare and contrast education tools to assist in chemotherapy order process;
    2. Explain how Oncology Pharmacy can lead efforts to establish multidisciplinary chemotherapy competency;
    3. Develop an action plan for identifying a mentor; and
    4. Describe different approaches for requesting mentorship from others.

    Concurrent Sessions 4
    Fundamental 4A: Oral Medication Adherence and Management in Oncology

    16:30-18:00

    Steve Stricker, Takeda Oncology, Florence, KY, USA
    As the global focus of drug development shifts from injectable to oral routes of administration, the responsibility for successful completion of the prescribed treatment regimen shifts from the infusion center to the patient and their caregivers. This paradigm shift for cancer therapy introduces new challenges for health care providers responsible for the management of patients with cancer. In this presentation, we will discuss challenges and barriers to oral medication adherence; methods for improving oral medication adherence; and clinical pearls related to the education and management or oral oncolytics.

    Learning Objectives:

     
    1. Discuss the current status of approved and investigational oral oncolytics;
    2. Identify challenges with the use of oral oncolytics and common causes of nonadherence;
    3. Review opportunities and methods for pharmacists to improve adherence with oral oncolytics; and
    4. Discuss clinical pearls related to education and management of oral oncolytics in clinical practice.

    Strategies to Improve Oral Medication Adherence in Oncology
    Harbans Dhillon, University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Increasingly the delivery of chemotherapy has changed from an inpatient to an outpatient model and many oral therapies are managed in the patient’s home environment. Adherence rates impact dosing, adverse events and ultimately, overall survival. The World Health Organization has cited the issue of non-adherence with oral chemotherapy as the single most important yet modifiable factor that can compromise treatment outcomes.

    In this presentation, several interventions to improve adherence to oral chemotherapy will be discussed. Maximizing adherence to oral chemotherapy agents can improve overall survival and life expectancy; improved safety and quality of life. Patients risk improper dosing and an increase in disease recurrence when there is non-adherence with medications. Correct dosing, education and symptom management are all critical to ensuring adherence. Other interventions incorporate education, early symptom identification and reminder prompts to improve adherence.

    Learning Objectives:

    1. Identify interventions to improve adherence to oral chemotherapy;
    2. Identify risks to patients on non-adherence; and
    3. Incorporating patient education and reminder prompts as part of counseling to improve adherence to oral chemotherapy.

    Research 4B: Investigational Agents Update

    16:30-18:00

    R. Donald Harvey, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
    Rowena Schwartz, McKesson Specialty Health, Magnolia, TX, USA

    One of the most exciting aspects of cancer care is the rapid evolution of drug therapy.  In the last five years we have seen the development of new agents, many first in class, and subsequent new applications of those agents. This rapid evolution of new anticancer drugs should be coupled with the practical challenges of successfully implementing these therapies into cancer care beyond the clinical trial.  New mechanisms of actions may be associated with unique treatment related toxicities, which may require innovative approaches to care.  During this session we will focus on drugs and drug classes that are currently being evaluated in clinical trials and discuss the role of the oncology pharmacist in optimizing care with these agents.

    Learning Objectives:

    1. Identify potential applications for the investigational agents discussed during this session;
    2. Describe proposed mechanism of action and toxicities associated with the drugs discussed; and
    3. Provide healthcare team and patient and caregiver team education about drugs discussed.

     

    Clinical 4C: Oncology Patients and Special Circumstances

    16:30-18:00

    Incidence of Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Patients Hospitalized at The Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas Lima
    Martha Estacio, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas Eduardo Caceres Graziani, Lima, Peru

    The actual incidence of drugs that cause liver damage in clinical practice is poorly understood. The international incidence in hospitalized patients is 0.7% to 1.4%. Most are idiosyncratic or unexpected origin. The main mechanism is the production of reactive metabolites produced in Phase I metabolism. The final outcome varies from a delay in treatment, liver failure or death.

    The diagnosis of hepatic adverse reactions in cancer patients remains a challenge due to the complexity of drug therapy, opportunistic infections, radiotherapy, pre-existing liver disease and genetic susceptibility.

    Learning Objectives:

    1. Identify the incidence of drug-induced liver injury in patients hospitalized at the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas Lima; and
    2. Determine medications that cause liver damage.

    Cancer in Pregnancy
    Peter Gilbar, Toowoomba Hospital, Toowoomba, Australia
         

    Cancer in pregnancy occurs rarely with an estimated incidence of one in 1,000 pregnancies. The most common malignancies in gestation are breast and cervical cancers, lymphoma, leukemia and melanoma. Diagnosis is often delayed as symptoms and physical signs of malignancy may be masked by those of pregnancy. Clinicians are faced with the challenge of providing the mother with the best options for treatment while ensuring the safety of the unborn child.

    The risks of systemic antineoplastic treatment (cytotoxic, endocrine, targeted agents and immunotherapy) administration during pregnancy depend on the drugs used and the gestational age of the fetus. During the period of organogenesis, chemotherapy administration carries an increased risk of fetal malformation and spontaneous abortion. The risk of malformations is significantly reduced in the second and third trimesters but chemotherapy can cause intrauterine growth retardation, pre-maturity and low birth weight. Administration of chemotherapy within 3 weeks of anticipated delivery is not recommended to avoid neonatal myelosuppression and potential complications like bleeding and sepsis. If chemotherapy is indicated, unless delivery can be accomplished within a few weeks of diagnosis, treatment should be instituted during pregnancy rather than waiting until after delivery.

    Information on the effects of antineoplastic drugs given during pregnancy is limited and has largely been derived from case reports and small case series. Most existing data is from older drugs such as the anthracyclines, with little information available on newer agents including monoclonal antibodies or targeted therapies.  Breast cancer in pregnancy should be treated similarly to that in non-pregnant patients except that chemotherapy is delayed until the second trimester. Hematologic malignancies are also treated in the same way.

    Learning Objectives:

    1. Understand the process for diagnosis of cancer in pregnancy;
    2. Recognize the risks associated with the use of systemic treatments in pregnancy;
    3. Understand which antineoplastic agents and supportive therapies are safe for use during pregnancy; and
    4. Appreciate the specific management of some of the more common malignancies (e.g. breast, lymphoma) seen in pregnancies.

    Back to Top

    Tuesday, April 19

    Plenary: Dermatologic Toxicities: The Superficial Side of Targeted Therapies         

    09:00-10:00

    Milan J. Anadkat, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA

    Systemic therapies (cytotoxic/targeted agents, immune checkpoint inhibitors) have resulted in remarkable improvements in patient survival across all cancers. Despite this remarkable success, the majority of patients treated with these drugs will develop dermatologic adverse events, which lead to decreased quality of life and inconsistent antineoplastic therapy, both of which may affect clinical outcome. This will provide up-to-date information on dermatologic adverse event incidence, mechanisms, clinical presentation, and preventive/therapeutic interventions. All of which is essential for optimal dermatologic care of people living with cancer.

    Learning Objectives:

    1. Recognize impact on quality of life and clinical characteristics of dermatologic adverse events to therapies in cancer;
    2. Describe the mechanisms involved in dermatologic adverse events to therapies in cancer; and
    3. Discuss mechanistically-based interventions to improve quality of life and decrease toxicity in cancer patients.

    Concurrent Sessions 5
    Clinical 5A: Hematological Cancer Updates 

    10:30-11:30

    Hematological Cancer Update: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)
    Tara Leslie,
    Tom Baker Cancer Centre and University of Alberta, Calgary, AB, Canada

    Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is characterized by the progressive accumulation of functionally incompetent monoclonal lymphocytes.  Recently, additional treatment options have become available for our CLL patients including those with deletion 17p and those with relapsed or refractory disease.   

    Learning Objectives:

    1. Discuss update of recent publications and abstracts for novel agents in CLL; 
    2. Discuss the role of ibrutinib and idelalisib in the management of CLL patients in current clinical practice; and
    3. Discuss the unique side effect profiles of these agents and a review of patient monitoring recommendations.

    Hematological Cancer Update: Lymphomas
    Alexandre Chan, National University of Singapore, Singapore

    Lymphomas are a heterogeneous group of malignancies that arise from malignant transformation of immune cells that reside predominantly in lymphoid tissues. Over the past few years, a number of clinical studies as well as novel treatment strategies have evolved the management of certain subtypes of lymphoma. In this session, the speaker will provide a succinct update on these findings.

    Learning Objectives:

    1. Discuss the role of lenalidomide in the management of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma;
    2. Discuss the novel therapies available for managing mantle cell lymphoma; and
    3. Discuss the role of immunotherapy in treatment of lymphomas.

     

      Fundamental 5B: Lean Thinking with the Toyota Production System

      10:30-11:30

      Shaun O'Connor, Box Hill Hospital (Eastern Health), Box Hill, VIC, Australia

      The Toyota Production System (TPS), a collection of tools, strategies and philosophies has been used to improve efficiency and reduce waste in many varied industrial processes, including incrementally in health. Chemotherapy Day Units (CDUs) provide a ripe ground for process improvements aimed at improving the patient experience, with a complex network of staff and data interactions aimed at delivering efficient and safe care for each one of our patients.  St Vincent’s Health, Melbourne, supported by Toyota Australia undertook an 18 month long improvement project focusing on the CDU. This presentation will walk though some of the processes and techniques used in this process, highlighting opportunities and pitfalls.

      Learning Objectives:

      1. Gain a basic understanding of terminology and concepts used in TPS and Lean;
      2. Understand the philosophy and process of a Jishuken improvement event; and
      3. Understand how some basic elements of TPS can be applied in your workplace.

      Clinical 5C: End of Life Care Discussion Session

      10:30-11:30

      Peter Gilbar, Toowoomba Hospital, Toowoomba, Australia

      Palliative cancer patients in their last months of life are commonly prescribed potentially inappropriate medications. These medications may be for secondary prevention of co-morbid diseases, often have no short-term benefit and may cause potentially harmful effects. In the palliative phase of cancer management, the focus of care should be on the patient’s quality of life, including alleviating suffering from cancer-related symptoms and treating short-term, acute medical illnesses. “Deprescribing” can be defined as the process of withdrawal of an inappropriate medication supervised by health care professionals with the goal of managing polypharmacy and improving outcomes. Deprescribing can benefit patients by reducing the associated costs, potential adverse effects and other burdens of polypharmacy in the last months of life. Guidelines have recently been developed to assist in this process.

      Delirium is the most common neuropsychiatric complication seen in patients with advanced cancer. The cause is generally multifactorial involving multiple medical conditions and adverse effects to medications. The management of delirium requires a team approach and involves a combination of non-pharmacologic and pharmacological interventions.

      This session will involve a facilitator-led group discussion of issues that may complicate end of life care in cancer patients undergoing palliative treatment. The primary focus will be on deprescribing and the management of delerium but if time permits other neurological symptoms, such as terminal restlessness, may be discussed.

      Learning Objectives

      1. To understand the concept and benefits of deprescribing unnecessary medications at the end of life;
      2. To recognise which medications and medication classes may be suitable for discontinuation in palliative patients and to formulate a strategy for deprescribing;
      3. To appreciate the many potential causes of delirium seen in patients with cancer; and
      4. To develop strategies for the management of delirium as part of a multi-disciplinary team involving both drug and non-drug approaches.

      Panel: Developing to Established….How to Define Oncology Pharmacy as a Specialty

      14:30-15:15

      Harbans Dhillon, University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
      Tara Leslie, Tom Baker Cancer Centre and University of Alberta, Calgary, AB, Canada
      Annemeri Livinalli, Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacêuticos em Oncologia, Jundiai, Brazil
      Klaus Meier, HKK GmbH, Stelle, Germany
      Shaun O'Connor, Box Hill Hospital (Eastern Health), Box Hill, VIC, Australia
      Rowena Schwartz, McKesson Specialty Health, Magnolia, TX, USA

      Moderator: Kellie Jones Weddle, Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, USA

      This session will provide various perspectives of how oncology pharmacy has been defined as a specialty. The panel will provide historical and current challenges and solutions for establishing oncology pharmacy specialty as a primary practice.

      Learning Objectives:

      1. Compare and contrast the different roles of oncology pharmacists around the globe;
      2. Describe the various certifications, licensing, credentials required throughout the world for oncology pharmacy practitioners; and
      3. Discuss resources and skills required to establish specialty of oncology pharmacy.
       

        Concurrent Sessions 6

        Clinical 6A: Supportive Care Updates

        15:15-16:15

        Milan J. Anadkat, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA

        Supportive Care Update: Alopecia

        Systemic therapies (cytotoxic/targeted agents) have resulted in remarkable improvements in patient survival across all cancers. Despite this remarkable success, the majority of patients treated with these drugs will develop alopecia and hair changes, which lead to decreased quality of life. This will provide up-to-date information on alopecia and hair change incidence, mechanisms, clinical presentation, and preventive/therapeutic interventions. All of which is essential for optimal care of people living with cancer.

        Learning Objectives:

        1. Recognize impact on quality of life and clinical characteristics of alopecia and hair changes to therapies in cancer;
        2. Describe the mechanisms involved in alopecia and hair changes to therapies in cancer; and
        3. Discuss mechanistically-based interventions to improve quality of life and decrease alopecia and hair changes in cancer patients.

        Supportive Care Update: Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Infections
        Claudio González
        , Unidad Oncología Hospital pediátrico Exequiel González Cortés, Santiago, Chile

        Chemoprophylaxis is prevention of disease by administration of a drug. In the antibiotic prophylaxis an antimicrobial agent is given to an individual who is at risk of developing an infection because of exposure or an impairment of host defense. Patients with cancer are in a significant risk for infection due to their treatment with chemotherapy, radiation, or surgery. The antimicrobial prophylaxis has a role as preventive strategy in the setting of specific infections. Is very important to know the scientific reasons for indications, dosage and safety of this kind of drugs. In this session, the speaker will provide an update in antibiotic prophylaxis for Infections.

        Learning Objectives:

        1. Discuss the role of antibiotic prophylaxis for infections;
        2. Review the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic principles in this setting; and
        3. Describe the safety of this preventive strategy.
         

        Clinical 6B: Bone Marrow Transplant Update

        15:15-16:15

        Role of the Clinical Pharmacist in a Stem Cell Transplantation Ward
        Tiene Bauters, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

        The number of hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (HSCT) has expanded in the last decades and still continues to increase. To ensure safe and effective care in this vulnerable high-risk population, treatment should be undertaken by an experienced and fully dedicated multidisciplinary team.

        HSCT pharmacists are well-positioned to take a lead role in patient assessment and development and implementation of guidelines for supportive care.

        This presentation aims to give an overview on clinical pharmacy activities in the HSCT setting augmented with examples of routine management for immunosuppression or complications related to HSCT, including participation in ward rounds, analysis of drug-related problems, counseling on discharge medication.

        In addition, the pharmacist’s role in the development and implementation of guidelines on acute and late effects or toxicities and involvement in quality assurance will be discussed.

        Learning Objectives:

        1. Recognize the role of the specialty pharmacist in a HSCT setting as a member of a multidisciplinary team; and
        2. Define commonly observed complications after HSCT.

        Bone Marrow Transplant Update
        Pablo Ramirez, Catholic University, Santiago, Chile

        Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has become a standard curative procedure in a number of malignant and non-malignant hematological diseases. Since its beginnings, over a million transplants have been performed worldwide and over 50,000 transplants are performed every year around the world. Several advances including better HLA determination techniques, new kind of donors as haploidentical donors, cord blood expansion and ex vivo T cell manipulation, have increased the donor availability so now virtually every individual in need has a potential donor for transplant. Despite this, there are still some barriers to overcome the limitations of transplant associated specially with mortality due to infections, graft rejection, graft vs host disease (GVHD), drug toxicities and relapses. New developments including better antibiotics, new drugs to better control GVHD and new strategies to decrease disease relapse are under study.

        Learning Objectives:

        1. Briefly review the beginnings of HSCT as a field;
        2. Identify common transplant indications;
        3. Describe main sources of hematopoietic stem cells;
        4. Describe main HCST complications;
        5. Describe alternative hematopoietic stem cells sources;
        6. Mention new findings about GVHD pathogenesis and strategies to control it; and
        7. Describe new strategies to decrease the risk for disease relapse

         

        Research 6C: How to Write your First Grant

        15:15-16:15

        Judith Smith, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
        R. Donald Harvey, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

        Very few of us ever can get enough information and perspective on how to write a grant. It is definitely more of an ‘art’ than a ‘science’ but this session will discuss the fundamentals necessary to build solid foundation of skills for writing and submitting peer-reviewed grant applications. The session will highlight many of the elements that that ISOPP Research Committee will look for in the 2016 applications as well as help identify other potential sources for research funding.

        Learning Objectives:

        1. Understand the general points on how to prepare a grant application;
        2. Be able to list and explain the eight sections of a research plan;
        3. Understand the key elements for a successful grant application;
        4. Develop your grant writing skills; and
        5. Develop a plan for identifying sources for research funding.

        Wednesday, April 20

        Panel: Global Impact of Cancer Care

        10:30-11:30

        • Alejandra Barahona, Chile
        • Peter Gilbar, Australia
        • Barry Goldspiel, USA​
        • Klaus Meier, Germany
        • Mario Jorge Sobreira da Silva, Brazil
        • Shinya Suzuki, Japan
        • Johan Vandenbroucke, Belgium
        • Carien Van der merwe, South Africa
        • Irene Weru, Kenya
        • John Wiernikowski, Canada

        The Global Health Agenda now includes cancer as a priority. In response, the World Health Organization (WHO) has developed a Global Non Common Disease Action Plan which includes cancer control as a key component. One of the objectives in this action plan is to increase access to medicines and essential technologies in all countries of the world. ISOPP is in preliminary discussion with WHO about potential collaborations. Please join us for this important discussion on how ISOPP and Oncology Pharmacists worldwide can collaborate to improve access to treatment for cancer patients.

         

        Concurrent Sessions 7

        Clinical 7A: Optimizing Care in the Older Adult with Cancer

        11:30-13:00

        Rowena Schwartz, McKesson Specialty Health, Magnolia, TX, USA
        Annemeri Livinalli, Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacêuticos em Oncologia, Jundiai, Brazil

        An essential component of cancer care is the individualization of drug therapy for each patient.  Over the last decade there has been increasing emphasis on the consideration of age as we select and implement cancer drug therapy including, but not limited to, chemotherapy.  During this session we will discuss the evidence for dose modifications based on age or age-related considerations.  In addition, strategies for optimizing anticancer drug therapy will be described including routine toxicity evaluation, education and assessment for the older adult with cancer.

        Learning Objectives:

        1. When given a clinical trial, evaluate the impact of age on drug dosing and dose modifications;
        2. Outline the aspects of aging that should be considered when determining appropriate cancer treatment for an older adult with cancer; and
        3. Describe strategies to minimize the impact of treatment-related toxicities for the older adult with cancer including chemotherapy dose modifications, minimization of polypharmacy and routine toxicity assessment and management.

        Research 7B: How Pharmacists Can Integrate Research into Daily Oncology Practice

        11:30-13:00

        Judith Smith, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
        Tiene Bauters, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

        Rosalyn Sims, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI, USA

        It’s the holy grail….to be able to have it all in your oncology pharmacy practice – patient care, educational opportunities (students/trainees) and RESEARCH! There is a spectrum of opportunities for oncology pharmacist’s to incorporate, participate and contribute to oncology research. This session will present various types of projects, including highlights from previous ISOPP grant recipients, that demonstrate successful stories of how you can integrate research into daily oncology practice to ultimately improve your patient outcomes as well as your advance your career development.

        Learning Objectives:

        1. Differentiate the potential opportunities for oncology pharmacist to initiate research projects within pharmacy practice;
        2. Define the characteristics of a good research question; and
        3. Explain how to identify and utilize resources for research project development and utilization.

         

        Concurrent Sessions 8

        Clinical 8A: Application of Pharmacogenomics in Daily Clinical Practice

        14:30-15:30

        Mario Chiong, University of Chile and Advanced Center for Chronic Diseases (ACCDiS), Santiago, Chile

        In 2001, the release of the draft sequence of the human genome marked a major biological milestone in the human history. Over one and a half decade later, this work continues to shape our biological understanding of normal and disease processes, with enormous implications for public health. During the last 15 years, genome analysis revealed a complete list of genes, genomic structure, and initial descriptions of functional roles, regulatory interactions, and disease-causing variants. For oncology, in particular, genome analysis allowed deeper tumor characterization and identification of distinct molecular subtypes based on gene expression patterns. This genomic information is now a central component of pharmacogenomics.

        All patients are the decisive beneficiaries of targeted therapies and pharmacogenomics research. In years past, particular cancer diagnoses were considered terminal, but because of improvements over the past 20 years in early detection and personalized treatments, some of these same malignancies are now treatable. In addition, the arsenal to fight cancer has grown beyond cytotoxics to include better-tolerated treatments with fewer severe side effects. Pharmacogenomics has helped define patient populations who are better suited to respond to a given therapy.

         

        Learning Objectives:

        1.     Understand the concept of pharmacogenomics;
        2.     Describe the state of the art of the associated technologies; and
        3.     Know current clinical applications on pharmacogenomics in oncology. 

         

        Fundamental 8B: Communicating Medical and Oncology Information to Health Care Professionals and Patients

        14:30-15:30

        Twitter and Virtual Journal Club: Stay Up to Date with Distance Learning
        Felice Musicco, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri Regina Elena San Gallicano, Rome, Italy

        Twitter is an online social networking service, accessible from any Internet-capable device. It is often used for integrating social networking with medical education and communications. It is also a very powerful tool that amplifies the content of scientific meetings to a wider audience, generating international engagement and global reach. In this lecture, we will discuss the mechanics of using Twitter, and we will discuss the suggestions and evidence for incorporating Twitter into many medical education contexts and symposia.

        In this lecture,we will also discuss how the ISOPP Virtual Journal Club leverage on internet technology. The journal club is intended to provide a way for oncology pharmacists to see articles published in Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice and to learn about developments in the field of oncology practice. Articles are posted monthly. To participate, read the article and then answer a series of online multiple choice questions about each article; after completing the questionnaire, participants will be emailed a personalized certificate.  23 issues of the ISOPP VJC have been published since 2012. We will discuss the way that VJC has been developed, how to participate and ideas to improve it through online discussions with Authors and Colleagues.

        Learning Objectives:

        1. Discuss the use of Twitter for professional means
        2. Understand how to reply, favourite and or RT tweets;
        3. Understand the use of hashtags to engage in conversations;
        4. Discuss how to tweet through basic tweets, and tweets with photos and images; and
        5. Discuss the use of the ISOPP Virtual Journal Club

         

        Social Media in Oncology, Risk and Benefit
        Gustavo Espinoza, Central de preparaciones oncológicas REDSANA, Santiago, Chile

        Social media has had an impact in the treatment of cancer. The use of social media in medicine provides new opportunities for health care professionals and institutions to interact with patients and other professionals. Wide availability of public information on oncology motivates patients and families and patients to become active seekers of medical information and participate in their care decisions. Social media platforms can be used for patient education, professional development, knowledge sharing, and for direct patient interaction. However, control of the information published, namely the credibility of the information available online, raises an ethical question on the information, especially with regard to maintaining the trust and the bond between the health professional and the patient.

        Learning Objectives:

        1. Understand how patients and health care professionals are utilizing social media in health-related information;
        2. Evaluate the use of new internet platforms in providing oncological information; and
        3. Recognize the advantages and disadvantages of use the social media in oncology

         

        Research 8C: Interacting with Professional Journals: Reviewing and Publishing

        14:30-15:30

        Alexandre Chan, National University of Singapore, Singapore
        Barry Goldspiel, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA

        Scholarly peer review is the process of subjecting an author's scholarly work, research, or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field, before a piece of work is published in a journal. In this session, we will provide an overview on the purpose of peer review and publishing. We will discuss how to conduct a peer-review on a manuscript.
        Learning Objectives:

        1. Understand the purpose of peer-review and publishing within the scientific process; and
        2. Discuss how to conduct a peer-review on a manuscript.

         

        Concurrent Sessions 9

        Clinical 9A: Gastrointestinal Tumors Update

        15:45-16:45

        Jorge Gallardo

         

        Fundamental 9B: Dose Banding: Safety and Savings in One

        15:45-16:45

        Carole R. Chambers, Tom Baker Cancer Clinic Pharmacy, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
        Johan Vandenbroucke, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

        Dose banding is a concept that first emerged in oncology around 2001. This session will include learning objectives to understand the term 'dose banding' and discover different implementation ideas using dose banding. Audience participation will be encouraged so, those of you who have incorporated dose banding in your practice, please come prepared to share during this session. Although it may have initially started as a cost saving initiative the safety components will also be explored in this session.

        Learning Objectives:

        1. Understand the term  'dose banding';
        2. Discover different implementation ideas using dose banding;
        3. Share with other ISOPP members your dose banding experience;
        4. Explore how dose banding can influence work flow; and
        5. Discuss opportunities for safety improvement with dose banding.
           

        Fundamental 9C: Tools and Methods for Pharmaceutical Care Plans and Documentation

        15:45-16:45

        Klaus Meier, HKK GmbH, Stelle, Germany

        Together with the community of the hospital pharmacist in Estonia and the Chamber of Pharmacists Slovenia the German Society for Oncology Pharmacy (DGOP) under the auspices of the European Society of Oncological Pharmacy (ESOP) has raised a three-year EU project with the title: Empowering pharmacists to improve health care for oral chemotherapy patients: Establishment of a European best-practice model — EPIC.
        The project aims are to work up an European best practice model for the development and implementation of supportive services for pharmacists in oral cancer therapy. Several tools are in use in order to support the sustainability of the program.

        1. Identify the resistances that hinder the successful target for compliance;
        2. Learning what qualities must have pharmacists to advise patients sufficient; and
        3. Develop patient to competent partners who can control their therapy confidently.

        Development and Implementation: The Tools required by Clinical Pharmacists to Conduct Safe Chemotherapy
        Shinya Suzuki, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japanese Society of Pharmaceutical Oncology, Japan

        Over the years, we have developed various tools for improving pharmacy services to ensure safe cancer chemotherapy. One of the important concepts on developing new clinical tools is to understand “what is a problem”, and what can be done to solve the problems. Recently, my colleagues at the pharmacy division of the National Cancer Center Hospital East and I developed a flowchart-type leaflet to manage patients’ adverse drug reactions due to chemotherapy, and  chemotherapy regimen check sheets to manage safe cancer chemotherapy. (J Oncol Pharm Pract 2015, and Sage Open Med 2014) To develop those tools we did not only develop the tools, but we have also implemented and validated the tools in order to document the data in daily practice. In this session, I would like to share ideas on what kinds of tools we have developed so far, and how did we develop these new tools to ensure safe cancer chemotherapy.

        Learning Objectives:

        1. Recognize and share useful tools for clinical pharmacy services;
        2. Understand how to develop and validate tools for clinical pharmacy services; and
        3. Share the experience and ideas we learned for ensuring safe cancer chemotherapy.

         

        Closing Panel: Cultural Diversity and Awareness in Oncology

        16:45-18:00

        Panelists: Sara Aguayo, Hospital Base San José Osorno, Osorno, Chile
        Tiene Bauters, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
        Harbans Dhillon, University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
        Peter Gilbar, Toowoomba Hospital, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia
        Kellie Jones Weddle, Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
        Shinya Suzuki, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
        John Wiernikowski, McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada

        Moderator: Rosalyn Sims, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI, USA

        This will be a discussion to highlight some differences in customs and cultures that an oncology pharmacist may encounter in daily practice when working in a culturally and ethnically diverse community.

        Learning Objectives:

        1. Discuss ways to relate to patients/family members or caregivers who may have different attitudes or customs in regards to interactions between genders;
        2. State different ways to overcome language barriers with patients and families;
        3. Describe some ways to overcome or work around treatment barriers when a patient or family may object to lifesaving therapies for cultural or religious reasons;
        4. Describe ways to explain to patients/families that homeopathic or alternative therapies may not be compatible with their treatment plan; and
        5. Identify some issues that could arise when treating patients from indigenous populations.